- Published on
Tests:
RT-PCR
[10] SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Multiplex RT-qPCR Kit (CD019RT), Creative Diagnostics
PDF with comments
The datasheet of this test states: "This product is for research use only and is not intended for diagnostic use" and provides the following info about specificity: "non-specific interference of Influenza A Virus (H1N1), Influenza B Virus (Yamagata), Respiratory Syncytial Virus (type B), Respiratory Adenovirus (type 3, type 7), Parainfluenza Virus (type 2), Mycoplasma Pneumoniae, Chlamydia Pneumoniae, etc." In other words, if you have any of these viruses or bacteria (and others non-specified by "etc.") you will test positive. It is clear to see that this test is not only not suitable for diagnosis but also highly unspecific.
[11] BIOFIRE® COVID-19, Biomerieux PDF with comments
In this report, Biomeriux receives authorization by the FDA to use their test BIOFIRE® COVID-19 to detect SARS-Cov-2 in clinical environments. However, they also state that it is not FDA approved and that it is only authorized to be used under the conditions defined in Section 564(b)(1) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(b)(1). Upon examining this section of the act it becomes evident that this tests are "intended to be held and not used".
[12] Corman et al., Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR, Euro Surveill. 2020;25(3):pii=2000045
PDF with comments
This study describes the development of a SARS-Cov-2 (2019-nCov) test by Prof. Christian Drosten (current advisor of the german governement in this crisis), which has been extensively used in Germany and all over the world during this pandemic. However, the study declares: "Detection of these phylogenetic outliers within the SARS-related CoV clade suggests that all Asian viruses are likely to be detected". In other words, you could test positive for any of the already known coronaviruses of this family.
[13] CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[14] LabCorp COVID-19 RT-PCR test EUA Summary
Both these documents, assert the following:
"Positive results are indicative of active infection with 2019-nCoV but do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease."
Yet, they have been widely used in the US to "confirm" infection cases.
Serological
[8] Laboratory testing for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in suspected human cases, Interim guidance 19th March 2020, World Health Organization
PDF with comments
This guideline from the World health organization states that "cross reactivity to other coronaviruses can be challenging" and references the following paper:
[9] B. Meyer et al., Serological assays for emerging coronaviruses: Challenges and pitfalls, Virus Research 194 (2014) 175–183
Some of the prominent scientists, lawyers or organizations which have been banned, defamed or simply ignored:
Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg
Prof. Sucharit Bahkdi
Medical doctor specialized in microbiology and infection epidemiology, former professor of the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz and director of the institute for medical microbiology and medicine (1991-2012), as well as one of the most cited scientists in his field. He sent an open letter to chancellor Angela Merkel with 5 questions about the measures taken during the corona crisis. His letter has been so far ignored.
Prof. Klaus Püschel
He leads the Institute of Forensics in the University Clinic in Hamburg and was in charge of making the autopsies for COVID-19 patients. He reported that all the patients who died had one or more severe diseases and qualified the measures taken as disproportionate.
Dr. Knut Wittkowski
Renowned epidemiologist who formerly headed the department of biostatistics at the Rockefeller University in New York. He has been misreported or misquoted by Tagesschau in Germany and news agencies in the US. He showcased in several videos the inefficacy of the social distancing measures and the lack of correlation between their implementation and the infection numbers.
Beate Bahner
A german lawyer from Heidelberg, specialized in medical and health matters, who sent an urgent petition to the Federal constitutional court of Heidelberg to stop the Corona measures that she qualified as "Coronoia". Her petition was denied, her webpage blocked by the police and she was brought by force to psychiatry.
All the material regarding the corona crisis has been removed from her webpage and she's now listed as absent for an undefined period of time.
Here is the original document from the police of Manheim blocking her webpage for urging people to meet on easter Monday, to protest against the corona measures.
After this situation, she was brought by the police, against her will, to a psychiatric clinic to be interned on 13.04.20. Really? Just because you're calling people to meet up and use one of their constitutional rights? This definitely seems disproportionate to me, and judging by this audio sent to her sister, it was done violently and stealthy. Two days later she was released and delivered a speech in front of the university clinic of Heidelberg, where she described this whole situation using irony and avoiding some keywords (the truth), which could potentially send her back to the clinic or jail.
In her speech, upon being questioned by the public about how she was abruptly taken by the police, she ironically told that she "just got drunk with some friends and then fell from her bike, which explains her head and leg bruises". Also during her speech she mentions how the german constitution has been modified in a span of 2 weeks, and she didn't know that now public demonstrations are considered a criminal act.
Mr Wilfried Schmitz, also a lawyer, wrote an open letter(german) to call for the clarification of her case and ecnouraged other lawyers to start acting against further developments in this direction. Here's my translation of the letter to english.
Journeyman Pictures
One of the most important filmmaking companies exposing the corruption of the World Health Organization with their documentaries and videos. Their Trust WHO documentary was blocked by Vimeo as the Corona pandemic started but can be bought for private use from their website or watched for free in Amazon Prime online. I highly recommend it to understand the corruption levels in the WHO. They also reported about the lies and irregular money flow to favor the drugs Tamiflu and Relenza during the previous Swine Flu pandemic. The full report of the irregularities of the previous pandemic can be found in this video by Tom Jefferson from the Cochrane Institute.
In addition, they have created a series of videos called Perspectives on the Pandemic with many experts discussing COVID-19. The episodes of this series involving Dr. Knut Wittkowski have been recently banned by youtube after one of them having almost 1M views.
Dr. Andrew Kaufman
Medical doctor with background in biology, oncology, hematology and psychiatry. His research on the origin of this pandemic encouraged me to dig deeper in this topic. He has thoroughly discussed all the irregularities surrounding the origin of this SARS-Cov-2 (COVID-19) and the previous SARS-Cov pandemic in 2003. Some of the findings presented here are carefully explained in his videos.
Prof. John Ioannidis
Professor of medicine, epidemiology and population health at Stanford University and codirector of the Meta-research Innovation Center also at Stanford. He has repeatedly shown through several studies carried out by his group that the infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in Santa Clara County, California is in the standard range for a common seasonal flu. In this video by Journeyman Pictures Prof. Ioannidis summarizes his thoughts about this pandemic.